Comments on: Epic Horse Exhaust

By: Troy Britain

Troy Britain — Fri, 25 May 2012 01:52:51 +0000

OK…(?)

By: Pigeons can't chess

Pigeons can't chess — Fri, 25 May 2012 00:16:45 +0000

I googled “Epic Horse” for a Photoshop project…

By: Open mouth, insert hoof « Playing Chess with Pigeons

Open mouth, insert hoof « Playing Chess with Pigeons — Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:53:28 +0000

[...] Epic Horse Exhaust [...]

By: Hyracotherium misinformation at scientificamerican.com « Playing Chess with Pigeons

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:14:46 +0000

[...] Epic Horse Exhaust [...]

By: toasty redhead

toasty redhead — Sat, 14 May 2011 23:58:56 +0000

I didn’t know that.

By: Christine Janis

Christine Janis — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:48:31 +0000

From the mouth of Eohippus —-As somebody who took a course (a small graduate seminar) on evolutionary biology with Gould (1984) I would like to inform Mr. Biele that he is completely mistaken in his views about what Gould thought.
Also, please note that nobody “discovers” phylogenies, especially not in the fossil record. Phylogenies are human constructs relating taxa in an evolutionary hierarchy — information from the fossil record is obviously included if available, and new information can result in a change in the phylogeny. Science is, after all, a human construct, otherwise it would be done by machines (or not at all).

By: Troy Britain

Troy Britain — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:36:55 +0000

Um, OK.

By: Unlallaquab

Unlallaquab — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:28:02 +0000

Hello everybody! I am new at this place. Just wanted to greet you :)

By: One more time with Biele « Playing Chess with Pigeons

One more time with Biele « Playing Chess with Pigeons — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:31:43 +0000

[...] more time with Biele Creationist Arthur Biele responded to my response, to his response of my critique of something he wrote on horse evolution [inhales [...]

By: Arthur Biele

Arthur Biele — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:05:02 +0000

Since you refuse me a full response to your article, I will not prepare a full response to your distortions of not only what Iwrote, but also of the PE’s views that theory is not at all complementary to Darwinisn evolution, but was meant to replace it. In the plaeontologists views, evidence for Darwin’s gradualistic theory of evolution is refuted by the fossil record. The PE theory was a means to save The General Theory of Evolution by proposing a new means by which evolution occurs. Of course that theory of evolution also has its’ critical faults too.

I was preparing a reply in my mind as I read each of your arguments and noting the many sophistical defenses you used in your long awaited reply. A long reply deserves an equal response, And it would have taken me a few days due to my busy schedule. But as you told me what amounts to be ‘take a hike’, that your site is reserved for your own views and accolades, I will honor your wishes. I indeed do plan to actually ‘take a hike’ as it would be good for my health.

My Best Wishes for your well-being and happiness.

Sincerely,

Arthur Biele